Module 15 Video Review

1. For each video list/discuss the key concepts you learned.

The Greenberg interview focused on Jackson Pollock and the legacy he left on all artists. He focused on his expression and how he painted. Pollock would use anything and everything to create his unique masterpieces, such as twigs, sticks, brushes, etc. All of which truly made him his own artist. Greenberg stressed that Pollock’s paintings were viewed differently and some would say they were “freakish.” His paintings seemed mindless but Greenberg said he was “speaking art.” Jackson Pollock did not spread his publicity, his art did. If it were his choice to not be seen, he would prefer that. 

The Michael Fried conversation between himself and T.J. Clark was focused on a few of Jackson Pollock paintings. They also spoke of the art history in relation to Pollock. Clark stresses the significance and historic views while Fried has an aesthetic difference of opinion. Clark sees Pollock paintings as struck by fragility and that the disbursement is somewhat even throughout. The line, quality and color are key in understanding Pollock. Fried sees an intense breakthrough and that Pollock was not clear on how to go on to the next stage of paintings. Although, they agree that the historical significance cannot be challenged.

2. Do the videos relate to the creation of your Art Criticism project? If yes, explain how. If no, explain why not.

The videos do not relate to my Art Criticism project. I am focusing on a presentation by Kylie O’Connell who found elemental photography pertaining to earth, water, fire, air and its combined processes. This is all about photography while the interviews were strictly painting critiques by Jackson Pollock.

3. What is your opinion of the films? Do they add depth to understanding of art criticism?

 I chose to focus on Jackson Pollock so therefore both are T.J. Clark interviews yet the perspective is different. Greenberg’s consisted of a sit-down interview that merely focused on him and the answers given. Some close up views and far away too which stressed his opinions of Pollock. You can tell that the interview is laid back and Greenberg felt quite confortable in his surroundings. 

The Michael Fried was a conversation piece with T.J. Clark. Also, Clark had a difference of opinion and stressed it very much, as did Fried. Both men feel differently toward the discussed art history of Jackson Pollock.

Both add depth to my understanding of art criticism because they make the viewers aware of how important art truly is to people. If one feels strongly about their opinion on the artwork, they should express it. The best thing about art and Jackson Pollock is that the differences of opinions should be stated and all are very significant. Jackson Pollock was at times not viewed as a “real artist” or what some described as an “outsider.” To me, art is real and should be open to everyone who would like to express themselves equally.